I also noticed that the Wikipedia description has the head and the galley on the port side. Must have not been on the boat or was looking in a mirror?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 27, 2021, at 7:31 PM, stan <stan at generalboats.com> wrote:
> 
> Only occasional emails to the list get through to me these days (never could find out why but suppose that is better for the health of the planet; if I got copies for every Rhodes I own the sun would be blocked) so I am not too clear on what is going on with this thread.  For starters: Re the photo, I know it looks a little like a Rhodes but it is not.  Anyone know who the builder is, I may be due some royalties.
> 
> stan
> 
> 
>> On 12/27/21 3:08 PM, daysails--- via Rhodes22-list wrote:
>>     On Monday, December 27, 2021, 01:08:51 PM EST, Rick Lange <sloopblueheron at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    So change it.
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Rick Lange
>> 
>> Hi Rick,
>> I would but I am onboard Second Wind enjoying record breaking warm temperatures here in Georgia   I thought we might have a historian in the group to take it on.
>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM daysails--- via Rhodes22-list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org> wrote:
>> 
>> It may come as a surprise to some, especially Stan, that Wikipedia reports that the Rhodes 22 is no longer in production.  There is actually a lot not to like about their write up of the Rhodes22.  They rely too heavily on one particular critical review calling into question for example, the practical usefulness of features unique to the boat and its pedigree as a Rhodes designed boat.  I think the tone is way to evaluative for a Wikipedia entry.
>>   -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: 11A80CF6-7A5B-435D-9DA9-F725F038EF14.jpeg
>> Type: image/jpeg
>> Size: 1501642 bytes
>> Desc: not available
>> URL: <http://rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20211227/63618b6d/attachment.jpeg>
>