< prior
Back to Month
Go to Thread
2020-10-27; 10:38:48 EDT
Member Since
2004-10-28
Posts: 1564
Here's another article. https://www.boatingmag.com/marine-solvents-for-removing-5200/ HankSee the original archive post
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:38 AM ROGER PIHLAJA <roger_pihlaja at msn.com> wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > The attached article is from the Dec 13, 2016 issue of Practical Sailor > magazine. Based on their testing, they recommend Re-Mov and BoatLife > Release for breaking the polyurethane adhesive bond between metal and > gelcoat. Neither product worked very fast on polyurethane and required > repeated applications and some scraping. I have no personal experience > with either product. Good Luck! > > Roger Pihlaja > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium > > PS Tests Adhesive Removers > > Re-Mov gives 100% bond strength after silicone removal. > estaff > Published:December 13, 2016 > 0< > https://www.practical-sailor.com/boat-maintenance/ps-tests-adhesive-removers#respond > > > < > https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.practical-sailor.com%2Fboat-maintenance%2Fps-tests-adhesive-removers > > > < > https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=PS+Tests+Adhesive+Removers&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.practical-sailor.com%2Fboat-maintenance%2Fps-tests-adhesive-removers&via=Practical+Sailor > > > <mailto:?subject=PS%20Tests%20Adhesive%20Removers&body= > https://www.practical-sailor.com/boat-maintenance/ps-tests-adhesive-removers > > > < > https://www.practical-sailor.com/boat-maintenance/ps-tests-adhesive-removers > > > > [cid:image001.jpg at 01D6AC4C.102C9EE0]< > https://s30384.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/p1b3sc94ue13941ps41g391aka1c586.jpg > > > > Many years ago, one of our editors had an old wooden boat with lovely > wooden handrails just inside the companionway that his sailing partner > decided could use new varnish. The original coat, which was peeling around > the base and worn where hands had gripped it, was sanded smooth and > meticulously coated with varnish. Subsequent coats were applied according > to the process that had served well for years-varnish, scuff, wipe, > varnish, scuff, wipe . . . repeat. > [aluminum hatch] > > The handrails looked beautiful, until about a week later when wrinkling, > peeling, and lifting was noticed at the base. The problem was blamed on the > varnish, a local brand purchased in Cartagena, Colombia, where the boat was > at the time. The handrails were left alone until they could track down a > more reputable varnish. When it failed the same way, it became obvious that > the varnish was not at fault. Only later did they discover that the > handrails, installed by a previous owner, had at one point been bedded in > silicone caulk. Even with all the sanding and prepping, enough traces > remained to interfere with the adhesion of the varnish at the base. > > Silicone caulk is notorious for wreaking havoc with the adhesion of > sealants and paint. In fact, you will probably find that new silicone > bedding does not bond well to surfaces that have been supposedly scrubbed > clean. The trouble is that old silicone can be deeply embedded in the pores > of gelcoat and wood, invisible to the naked eye. > > Instead of silicone, many boaters prefer polyurethane, polysulfide (not > compatible with acrylic or Lexan), and butyl caulks because they last > longer, leak less, and do not leave behind a residue that will hinder > adhesion. But as we saw in our recent report on caulks (see Marine Sealant > Adhesion Test, PS December 2016 online), silicone is a versatile sealant > and is particularly effective when sealing glazing for portlights and > hatches. > > The retreat to polyurethane adhesive sealants, such as 3M 5200, raises > another bonding issue. They work too good. As weve seen in a number of > previous tests, 3M 5200-considered by many to be the gold standard for > bedding underwater fittings-is not the best choice for fittings that you > may want to re-bed. > > What many people don't realize is that 3M 5200 is considered a > semi-permanent adhesive-sealant with an emphasis on adhesive. Its grip is > so tenacious that it can pull gelcoat right off the deck when hardware is > pried loose. It is particularly well suited for through-hulls, but for > bedding most deck hardware, there are better solutions. (See The Great > Stickup: Practical Sailor Tests Marine Adhesives, Caulks, and Sealants< > http://www.practical-sailor.com/issues/36_8/features/Marine-Adhesives-Caulks_5953-1.html>, > PS August 2010 online.) > > Pondering the adhesive-sealant conundrum, the same questions kept coming > back to us. Can we still use silicone products for those jobs that they do > best, like sealing plastic and glass glazing, without jeopardizing future > repairs? Is there not a solvent that would remove the silicone residue when > it came time to varnish or re-bed? And what about removing 5200 or similar > high-strength adhesives? Would any solvent that is aggressive enough to > soften these caulks also damage the substrate? > > What We Tested > > To answer these questions, we mounted a product test of adhesive removers. > The test field included the obvious choices, xylene and acetone-solvents > commonly used in the marine industry for removing contaminants and prepping > surfaces for new paint-from the familiar hardware-store brand Kleen Strip. > > The focus of the test field were five products that makers claim will > remove any trace of silicone and polyurethane caulks: BoatLife Release, > designed to simplify the removal of a wide range of adhesives; Marine > Formula DeBond, a patented chemical product to remove polyurethane > adhesive-sealants such as 3M 5200; Un-Hesive, another patented product used > to remove cured polyurethane adhesive; Re-Mov, a product that claims to > break the bond of most commercial adhesives; and Lift-Off Silicone Caulk > and Foam Sealant Remover (FSR), from Motsenbocker, a company that offers a > wide range of adhesive removers. > > None of the products we tested claim to dissolve the caulk, they simply > break the bond with the substrate. All suggest that the process may require > several applications and a specific dwell time (wait period before scraping > or re-application) of up to 30 minutes. > > How We Tested > > Our first test was simply to compare ease of use, to see how quickly and > easily they removed the visible remnants of silicone. For this, we used a > hatch that was in need of a lens replacement. > > We applied each product to a taped-off section of the hatch and allowed it > to soak, according to the instructions. We then followed the makers > instructions, following the chemical application with tools designed to > help physically break the bond. We used tools that have served well on > similar projects, a razor knife, a wire brush, and a hose hook, which > resembles a bent ice pick. (See Hose Fitting Tips< > http://www.practical-sailor.com/issues/37_65/features/Hose-Fitting-Tips_11997-1.html>, > PS May 2016 online.) After comparing the performance on the six taped-off > sections, we used the most effective product to clean the entire frame and > set it aside for reglazing. The reglazed hatch will be incorporated into a > long-term test against untreated controls to determine whether > acrylic/aluminum adhesion is in any way compromised or improved over time. > > To test the removers debonding effectiveness on gelcoated surfaces (as > well as any potential harm to gelcoat), we covered six gelcoated, > 1/8-inch-thick fiberglass coupons with a thin layer of 3M Marine Silicone > Caulk. Six other identical coupons were coated with 3M 4200 Fast Cure > polyurethane caulk. Testers let the bonded coupons cure for six weeks, then > treated each coupon with an adhesive remover, making three applications 30 > minutes apart. We examined the samples after each application, gently > testing adhesion. > > After the final application of each product, we began scraping one side of > each coupon with a plastic scraper to compare ease of removal. If we were > able to remove most of the caulk from a coupon, we cleaned more > aggressively using a wire brush by hand. We then added a second application > of the same caulk remover, and finally, we cleaned the coupon with soap and > water. Any coupon that came reasonably clean was then bonded to an > identical, untreated coupon using either 3M Marine Silicone or 3M 4200. > > Observations > > Neither acetone nor xylene had any measurable effect on either silicone or > polyurethane, so that is all well say about them here. On the aluminum > hatch frame, all five of the dedicated caulk removers significantly > weakened the bond of the silicone caulk and helped reduce prep time, but > Re-Mov performed the best. We used Re-Mov to do the final cleaning on our > aluminum hatch frame and were impressed with the result. > > On the fiberglass/gelcoat coupons, BoatLife Release, DeBond, and Re-Mov > softened the silicone and loosened the edges after the initial treatment > and scraping. However, when we began scraping the coupons with a soft > plastic scraper after the second treatment, the Re-Mov sample was clean > after just a few strokes, with only traces of silicone remaining. A third > application of Re-Mov and a little scrubbing with a regular toothbrush > removed 100 percent of the remaining caulk. > > BoatLife Release made it much easier to scrape away the silicone caulk, > but considerable residue was left in the depressions. Even after > retreatment with BoatLife Release and vigorous scrubbing, it was clear that > only aggressive and potentially damaging methods such as a wire brush or > grinding would remove the rest of the silicone. In the end, only the Re-Mov > and BoatLife Release coupons advanced to the bonding test. > > Although vendors claimed their products were highly effective on > polyurethanes, our experience didn't match the claims. After the first > application to the fiberglass coupons, we saw little change in adhesion. > However, after repeated applications 15 to 30 minutes apart, we met > success. With the aid of a razor knife and some hand scrubbing with a wire > brush, Re-Mov and BoatLife Release were able to get down to a bare surface > with minimal gelcoat damage. Of the two, the BoatLife Release was the most > effective on polyurethane. > > We also tried using the test products to release the bond between of two > of our sample gelcoat/ fiberglass coupons bonded with high-strength > polyurethanes. No matter which product we used, the samples simply could > not be separated without breaking the relatively fragile coupons. > > After test-followup conversations with some adhesive-remover makers, weve > decided to re-test all of the products on fiberglass-to-fiberglass bonds > made with 3Ms 5200. Look for an update on these results in an upcoming > issue. > > All of the products were more effective at breaking the bond between > polyurethane adhesive and aluminum. Two polyurethane adhesives, 3M 5200 and > 3M 4200, could be released from aluminum using any of the removers. > However, none of the products could break the bond between aluminum and > Loctite PL S40 or Loctite Marine Caulk. > > Our final test proved that at least one product could remove silicone > without compromising subsequent adhesion. The fiberglass/gelcoat coupons > that had been treated with Re-Mov and BoatLife Release were thoroughly > scrubbed and washed with soap and water and then bonded to identical, > untreated textured gelcoat/fiberglass coupons. The samples were allowed > cure for eight weeks and then pulled to failure. The BoatLife Release > yielded results that fell short of the bond strength between untreated > surfaces, but Re-Mov impressed us by restoring full bond strength to the > silicone-contaminated surface. > > BoatLife Release > > This product comes in a convenient spray bottle and is advertised for its > ability to remove cured sealants from fiberglass, wood, metal, and glass. > It also is supposed to work on residue from decals, tapes, labels, and > other adhesives, and is safe to use on most carpeted, vinyl, plastic, and > painted surfaces. When attacking the aluminum hatch and the textured > fiberglass samples, BoatLife Release quickly softened the caulk, and some > of it began peeling. But after three applications, 15 minutes apart, it was > clear that it wasnt releasing the bond completely, and that aggressive > cleaning with a wire brush would be needed. It was moderately effective on > polyurethane. > > Bottom line: BoatLife Release is recommended for tough jobs involving > polyurethane. It finished in second place for overall performance. > > Motsenbocker Lift-Off > > Motsenbackers Lift-Off Silicone Caulk and Foam Spray Remover comes in a > spray bottle, but it is a gelled liquid that must be spread around with a > brush or plastic spreader. It was more effective than xylene and acetone > when cleaning the aluminum hatch frame, but was completely ineffective on > textured fiberglass. > > Bottom line: Lift-Off does not compare well to other products in this > category. > [cid:image001.jpg at 01D6AC4C.102C9EE0] > Re-Mov Silicone and Adhesive Remover > > This remover was our most effective overall for removing both silicone > caulk residue and polyurethane adhesive. According to the maker, Re-Mov > will debond polyurethane-bedded hardware even if it has been in place for > years. While we found it a bit slower acting than other products, the end > results were truly impressive. Two applications, 15 minutes apart, a few > quick passes with a plastic scraper, 20 seconds scrubbing with a bristle > brush, and a good wash with soap and water, eliminated all the silicone > from a textured deck, allowing it to match original bond strength. > > If we had a bonding or coating job in which silicone contamination of the > surface was suspected, this would be our antidote. Polyurethane caulk was a > tougher challenge, but it did allow us to remove the caulk without damaging > the gelcoat. > > Bottom line: Re-Mov is the PS Best Choice and Budget Buy for removing > silicone or polyurethane caulk. > > Un-Hesive > > Un-Hesive is advertised to be specifically formulated to release the bond > of extremely potent polyurethane adhesive sealants such as 3M 5200 and > Sikaflex. Makers claim it breaks the grip of these polyurethane adhesives > without material breakdown. It is meant to be sprayed on, and the cured > sealant is to be easily peeled off. Our own experience fell short of > expectations. > > Bottom line: Un-Hesive made it easier to clean the aluminum hatch, but its > poor performance on textured fiberglass dulled our enthusiasm. It was not > effective on polyurethane caulk. > > DeBond > > The lone aerosol in the group, Marine Formula DeBond is the signature > product of DeBond Corp., one of the first companies to put these types of > products into the hands of do-it-yourselfers. DeBonds claims specifically > targeted 3M 5200. In our tests, it helped a little when dealing with > silicone caulk, but it was not very effective on polyurethane. > > Bottom line: Were withholding a final rating on DeBond pending the results > of our 5200/fiberglass re-test. > > Conclusion > > Based on our experience with a couple of these products, we see no good > reason to ban silicone from the boat, or to rev up the grinder every time > you pull up a 5200-bedded stanchion. Re-Mov is the clear winner in the > silicone-caulk removal category, but youll need a little patience. Wait 15 > to 25 minutes before attacking the adhesive with a scraper. If > polyurethanes are the bane of your current project, reach for the BoatLife > Release, but expect that it is still going to be hard work, with > considerable scraping and other mechanical efforts to remove the final > traces. > Caulk Removers > [cid:image003.jpg at 01D6AC4C.102C9EE0] > Contacts > · Boatlife<http://www.boatlife.com/> > · DeBond<http://www.debondcorporation.com/> > · Motsenbocker<http://www.liftoffinc.com/> > · North Star<http://www.un-hesive.com/> > · Re-Mov<http://www.re-mov.com/> > > > Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > From: Jesse Shumaker<mailto:jesse.laten.shumaker at gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 9:51 PM > To: The Rhodes 22 Email List<mailto:rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org> > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] removing tabernacle > > Hi, I'm attempting to remove the mast tabernacle in order to install the > Dwyer Halyard Organizer plate (part DH288). The three screws came out > easily, but the tabernacle is still attached very strongly with an > adhesive. I don't know what adhesive was used. The adhesive is colored > white. I tried heating up the plate with a soldering iron and tried to > squeeze in a razor but have been unable to break the seal. > > I would appreciate any tips from the group on how to free the tabernacle > from the cabin top. Thanks in advance for any advice! > > Jesse Shumaker > S/V Zephyr > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: 4E1D0A3AF09C4F93BFB5A230C468B0CA.jpg > Type: image/jpeg > Size: 35407 bytes > Desc: 4E1D0A3AF09C4F93BFB5A230C468B0CA.jpg > URL: < > http://rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20201027/2fa3e4dd/attachment.jpg > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: E59E01FBC1034C7AB266607A62717808.jpg > Type: image/jpeg > Size: 81188 bytes > Desc: E59E01FBC1034C7AB266607A62717808.jpg > URL: < > http://rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20201027/2fa3e4dd/attachment-0001.jpg > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: F79E75072ADC44FC883FBEF1EC725EE3.jpg > Type: image/jpeg > Size: 146922 bytes > Desc: F79E75072ADC44FC883FBEF1EC725EE3.jpg > URL: < > http://rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20201027/2fa3e4dd/attachment-0002.jpg > > >
To use your email application to send a messsage to the webmaster rather than this form, .
Your post is being sent... 