< prior
Back to Month
Go to Thread
2020-04-24; 18:24:31 EDT
Member Since
2012-05-23
Posts: 196
Hi Chris: I thought you had a riding sail and that it worked well for you. If you still have pictures could you post them? Thanks and cheers, Shawn s/v Sweet BabooSee the original archive post
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, 1:16 PM Chris Geankoplis <chrisgeankoplis at gmail.com> wrote: > I like the bow eye and painter anchoring method. I’ll try it next year when > I can get to Enosis in Greece. I was given as a gift a riding sail similar > to a Banner Bay sail. I don’t use a boom room so I’m not a windvane and the > boat hunts a lot. With the riding sail it is rock steady. If the swell is > off from the wind I can often bring the bow into the swell for a nice > night’s sleep using an appropriate preventer. I don’t use it if there are > strong altering tidal currents. > > Chris Geankoplis > > ENOSIS > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 09:28, ROGER PIHLAJA <roger_pihlaja at msn.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > By the time I put up the pop top + enclosure and the cockpit boom room > > enclosure, S/V Dynamic Equilibrium has so much windage aft of the center > of > > buoyancy; that, the bow always points strongly into the wind, like a big > > weather vane. This weather vane tendency is so strong it overwhelms any > > effect that the off center pull from using the bow chock/bow cleat vs. > the > > bow eye might cause. Yes, in theory, the off center pull does generate a > > torque that might cause the boat to sail around its anchor. But, the > > weather vane effect from the excess windage aft completely dominates the > > boat’s response to a wind shift. > > > > We don’t have tidal current shifts here on the great lakes and rivers > > always tend to flow in the same direction. I’d be interested in hearing > > from ocean sailing Rhodies regarding whether anchoring from the bow eye > vs. > > bow chock/bow cleat makes any difference in the way the boat lies to a > > current vs. the way it lies to the wind. My expectation is that there is > > very little difference; but, I’d like to hear from people that have > actual > > experience. > > > > Regarding the question about using the bow eye vs. the bow chock/bow > cleat > > when tied up to a mooring – Commercial moorings usually have a huge > > mushroom anchor or engine block buried in the mud and all chain rode up > to > > the mooring ball. This setup has little, if any, shock absorbing > > properties. But, isn’t the pennant from the mooring ball up to the boat > > usually nylon? Isn’t that where the shock absorbing is supposed to > occur? > > If so, you definitely wouldn’t want to use chain here. Given the huge > size > > of the mooring anchor and all steel chain rode, I don’t think it makes > much > > difference whether you use the bow eye or the bow chock/bow cleat when > > tying up to a mooring. That huge, deeply set, mooring anchor is not > going > > to move no matter how much or how little scope you let out. > > > > Roger Pihlaja > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium > > > > Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > > Windows 10 > > > > From: Peter Nyberg<mailto:peter at sunnybeeches.com> > > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 9:40 PM > > To: The Rhodes 22 Email List<mailto:rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org> > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Bow Eye vs. Bow Cleat? > > > > I am in total agreement with Roger on the benefits of anchoring from the > > bow eye rather than the bow cleat. > > > > My approach to doing so is a little different. I have 10’ of 3/8” line > > with a thimble in one end permanently attached to the bow eye with a > > shackle. I refer to this line as my ‘painter’. When I’m not anchored, > the > > painter is looped over and tied off to the pulpit. After I’ve anchored, > I > > attach the painter to the rode, and let out more scope so that the > painter > > takes the load. > > > > In addition to effectively increasing your scope, this approach > eliminates > > any chafing that might occur where the rode comes over the toe-rail. > > > > I originally tried this approach because someone way back in the archives > > suggested that it would reduce the tendency of R22 to swing on its > anchor. > > Unfortunately I did not find this to be true to any significant extent. > > > > Peter Nyberg > > Coventry, CT > > s/v Silverheels (1988/2016) > > > > > > > On Apr 23, 2020, at 5:51 PM, ROGER PIHLAJA <roger_pihlaja at msn.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > There is a real advantage to rigging the anchor line thru the bow eye > > vs. directly to the bow cleat. The choice of the bow eye vs. the bow > cleat > > has a significant effect on the anchor scope. This is because the bow > eye > > is ~1.5 ft closer to the water vs the bow cleat. For example, suppose we > > are anchoring in 7 feet of water. The bow eye is ~2 feet above the water > > and the bow cleat is ~3.5 feet above the water. Suppose we let out 65 > feet > > of anchor rode. The scope using the bow eye is 65 / (7 + 2) = 7.2 The > > scope using the bow cleat is 65 / (7 + 3.5) = 6.2 A scope of 7.2 is > > sufficient for decent overnight holding with a minimum 65 foot radius > swing > > circle. A scope of 6.2 is marginal for an overnight night stay. > > Sometimes, there isn’t sufficient swing room to let out more anchor rode, > > say if you are the last boat to drop the hook in a crowded anchorage. In > > addition, it’s considered bad anchoring etiquette to use up all the swing > > room in an anchorage even if you are the first one there. > > > > > > Fortunately, you don’t have to tie off to the bow eye in order to get > > the scope advantage of using it. Simply run the anchor rode thru the bow > > eye first, then up to the bow cleat, and cleat it off. This will give > you > > all the scope advantage of using the bow eye and all the ease of tying > off > > to the bow cleat. When departing, reach down and hook the anchor rode > with > > a boat hook below the bow eye. Pull the anchor rode on board, hang on to > > it, and then uncleat the rode from the bow cleat. Easy peasy and no > stress > > on the knees! > > > > > > I always use the bow eye in the manner described above. There is just > > no reason not to, the extra safety margin on scope helps me sleep better, > > and I don’t annoy my fellow boaters. > > > > > > Roger Pihlaja > > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium > > > > > > > >
To use your email application to send a messsage to the webmaster rather than this form, .
Your post is being sent... 